🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.